02 / COMPARE EVIDENCE

Same question. Different kinds of proof.

Place linked claims beside their original sources. The page distinguishes company context, regulatory support, disagreement, and the questions this historical graph cannot answer.

Comparison rule

A comparison is shown only when the expected source links and dated claims are present. Partial evidence is labelled as incomplete.

PUBLISHED SANITY SOURCE TRAIL

What does a reserve snapshot actually prove?

Checking a customer's inclusion and assessing an exchange's overall liabilities are different questions.

QUESTION TO INVESTIGATE

What can a customer check in a proof-of-reserves snapshot, and what does that leave unverified?

Follow the published Sanity links from this question to each dated claim and its original source.

TRY IT LOCALLYpython agent.py --case compare
PUBLISHED SANITY SOURCE TRAIL

Reading the published evidence graph…

HOW TO INTERPRET A COMPARISON

Different claims can be true within different scopes.

Company account

Read a company description as a claim about its own process. Customer inclusion in a snapshot is narrower than an independent finding about solvency.

Official caution

Check whether a publication is an investor alert, an advisory, a staff position or an individual Commissioner statement. Attribution matters.

Time boundary

Sources from different years answer questions available then. None supplies a live price, a current asset balance or a present trading decision.

Explore all question dossiers ↗